Neo-Con Priorities
The NEW "G"reed "O"ver "P"eople Party Priorities:
M E M O R A N D U M
From: Grover G. Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform
To: Members of the United States Senate
Date: 09/02/05
Re: Death Tax Repeal/Katrina
In light of this week’s tragic hurricane in Louisiana,
some politicians have suggested that tax cuts in general and death tax repeal
specifically should not move forward. This is a similar argument which was made
following the Iraq War and the 2003 tax cut. That analysis turned out to be very
wrong. In March 2003, the United States Senate voted on a number of amendments
to reduce the budget window of President Bush’s Jobs and Growth Tax
Reconciliation Act. Opponents’ efforts to cut the size of the tax cut package
were narrowly defeated the week before. But with the campaign in Iraq entering
its third week and fresh cost estimates of more than $70 billion released Monday
morning, Sen. John Breaux (D-LA) proposed an amendment to the budget to redirect
$396 billion of the tax cut into a “reserve fund” to strengthen Social Security.
The measure narrowly passed and the President’s tax cut was reduced by more than
half.
In retrospect, this “half a tax cut” generated an additional
$238 billion of economic growth over two years than was forecasted by the
Congressional Budget Office four months after the tax cut was signed into law.
To put this in perspective, these higher levels of economic growth translated
into an additional $1,960 per American household. At the same time, $4 trillion
of new shareholder wealth has been created and 4 million new jobs have been
added to the American workforce. The result is higher than expected tax revenues
which are $112 billion above the Congressional Budget Office August 2003
baseline.
Now imagine how much more growth, investment, jobs, and
wealth would have been created if the Senate passed the entire package put forth
by President Bush. The 2003 tax cut is instructive to the recent tragic events.
Opponents of permanent repeal of the Death Tax are attempting to exploit this
tragedy to put off a vote. Proof that they are exploiting this tragedy is that
they were never for repeal of the Death Tax in the first place. They were
against this proposal six years ago, five years ago, four years ago, three years
ago, two years ago, and two weeks ago.
By stalling the vote they believe that the issue will not fit
in the calendar on a later date. The 2003 tax cut lifted economic growth far
beyond what most people expected. We know repeal of the Death Tax will also have
a similar effect. And higher levels of economic growth is exactly what the
residents of the Gulf Region need at this time to start the rebuilding process
for their neighborhoods and more importantly for their lives.
-----------------------------------
"We have two competing world views in American politics. The first says
that government cannot help people. That government must be as small as
possible, and exists only to provide security from external enemies. The other
says that government can be a force for good and can help make people's lives
better.
This week, we are seeing the effects of the lack of government. The American
people are seeing what happens when the GOP worldview is dominant. We've talked
about the two disasters -- the hurricane itself, which was unavoidable, and the
response to the hurricane and lack of leadership, which was.
"We are seeing a third disaster -- the conservative world view itself, crashing
and burning as reality meets ideology. Where government programs are slashed in
the name of Norquist's drownable government, only to see an entire major city
wiped off the face of the map as a result."
-Kos
-----------------------------
And this is why these "globalists" are the most dangerous men
and women the world has ever known. Individually, they are scary. Together, and
in power, they are disastrous.
-Noah Greenberg, forwarded by Robert Scardapane
The economy is in the toilet. The war in Iraq is escalating and over 1,400 American troops have lost their lives. 84.000 new students won't get their Pell Grants.
The first order of business for the Republican majority in the House of Representative?
THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE TOM DELAY STAYS THE MAJORITY LEADER... NO MATTER WHAT.
That's right. The person that brought you
the redistricting of the
After Tom Delay whined that the Democrats were playing the "politics of personal destruction", the House Republicans made the first order of business a rule change that would allow an indicted majority leader to keep his position.
You just have to love the way the
Republican majority look out for themselves. First it was Senator and doctor
Bill Frist, the Senate Majority Leader from
At least the Republican leadership have their priorities in order.
Those Sneak-and-Peekers
The Republican House Majority wants to sneak-a-peek at your income tax returns, much in the same way they want to sneak-a-peek in your house when you're not home in the name of the Patriot Act.
Why would they want to sneak that provision in at the last minute? Why would they put it in an "Omnibus" bill (a bill that contains many parts that have to be passed as a whole, not in part). Why would they hide it in this 14 pound Omnibus bill? Why would the Republican Majority in the House want to look at YOUR income tax returns? How did this bill make it through all the House members and their staffs before it was discovered by senate staff members
Reason 1: What "causes" or charities do you contribute to? Maybe a left wing charity or a non-mainstream church. That's a good way to find "subversives" I guess
Reason 2: Are you a gambler? Did you win or lose a lot of money this year? I wonder what the government can do with that piece of news?
Reason 3: That's a lot of extra medical bills you have there. We need to let your insurance company know about that!
Reason 4: $2,000 to the DNC? There's a red flag if ever I saw one.
Reason 5: Let's cross-reference registered Republicans with any windfalls they received during the past year. Maybe part of Grandma's inheritance or that big lottery win could go to help some poor, worthy Republican candidate.
Sneak-and-peek have become the new catch-phrase of the Republican Party. First it was the Patriot Act. Now your tax returns.
What’s next?
-Noah Greenberg