www.nationalview.org and Note From a Madman brought to you by
for your Information Technology needs
owned and operated by Noah "The Madman" Greenberg
The World's Biggest Fool on All Fools' Day
This Is What Democracy Looks Like
Today's Note From a Madman
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
Media Madman - An AP headline
Bush, Democrats escalate Iraq war debate
Listening to the talking heads, especially the ones on Fox News and WABC Radio
in New York, you'd think that a debate about the Iraq war and its funding was a
bad thing. Let me put that myth to rest: It isn't. Someone, more specifically,
probably someone in the White House decided to start a campaign that any debate
about the Iraq war, in any way, shape or form, is anti-American,
anti-troop-support and, well, just downright treasonous. It isn't either.
We are so used to a Congress that says "Yes sir, Mr. President, Anything you
want," that we forget that the job, spelled out by nothing less than the US
Constitution, of our elected representatives is to set up these debates and, by
consensus with the President, come up with the best plan for our nation. It's
obvious to at least 65 percent of our nation, at this point in time, that
President Bush's unfettered and unfiltered (by the Congress) plans, so far, have
simply not been working. and in the case of Iraq, their "not working" has led to
the loss of American lives.
Even Bush's economic policies, which the GOP and the wealthier class of
Americans, have been touting over the past few months as "making the economy
stronger" have been ignoring the fact that this "recovery(?)" has left a grand
majority of their countrymen out of this beneficial loop. Of course, when there
are no jobs, many more of the poor will join the armed forces, and...
Harry Reid (DEMOCRAT-NV), the Senate Majority and President Bush, the media
tells us, are headed for a show-down of sorts. Reid is out and out in favor of
withholding funds the President seeks in his bid to practice the oversight which
has been so sorely lacking these past four years. Bush, Fox and the other
neo-con cronies could only respond with" The Democrats hate the troops." Yet,
the President doesn't call on either House Leader Nancy Pelosi (DEMOCRAT-CA) or
Reid to come to the White House and talk this whole thing out/
Why?
Is it because the President knows he is right (much in the same way he has been
certain before)?
Is it because the President's advisors have finally come up with a "Plan" to
finally win the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people? (I thought that plan was
in place already - Like Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said, "You stick
with 'Plan A'.")
Or is it because this President simply must have his way? ("I'm the Decider,"
"This would be a whole lot easier if this was a dictatorship…just as long as I’m
the dictator!")
The debate about Iraq war funding is a valid one. After all, were promised by
the Bushies early on that this war wouldn't last long, wouldn't cost much and
that we would be "welcomed as liberators" by the likes of Donald Rumsfeld, Dick
Cheney, Rice and President bush himself. Their being so wrong, so often, not
allows the debate which the President doesn't want and tells us is "dangerous",
but it screams for it to take place.
"If the president vetoes the supplemental appropriations bill and continues to
resist changing course in Iraq, I will work to ensure this legislation receives
a vote in the Senate in the next work period,"
-Reid
The President may actually win this war of words against the forces of
compromise in the House and the Senate, especially given the power of the bully
pulpit which is his. However, it doesn't make him right.
-Noah Greenberg
THE LAVENDER TUBE: GRINDHOUSE
by Victoria A. Brownworth
copyright c 2007 San Francisco Bay Area Reporter, Inc.
So there we were, watching *American Idol* and the thought came to us: George
Bush and Sanjaya have a lot in common. Both are talentless oafs who keep getting
re-elected despite their lack of talent.
At least Sanjaya is cute. And *his* tone-deaf repertoire isn’t likely to bring
the world to an end, even if it does make little girl’s cry.
Bush’s tone-deafness, on the other hand....
We’re waiting for the time when real TV–you know, dramas and sit-coms–supplants
the stories coming out of the Bush White House for suspension of disbelief.
Hmmm. Don’t hold your breath waiting for *that.*
Well, unless you have Showtime. (And if you don’t, how *exactly* are you
watching *The L Word*?) Then you can start watching *The Tudors*(if you missed
the first episode, you can see it online at www. SHO. com), which is political
intrigue at its very, very best.
Focusing on the life, loves and political maneuverings of Henry VIII, *The
Tudors* is a ten-episode series. Shot on location in Ireland, the series was
created, written and produced by Michael Hirst, who did the phenomenal
*Elizabeth,* with Helen Mirren and Jeremy Irons. First, we *adore* the
creepy-sexy Jonathan Rhys Meyers (he was soooo good in Woody Allen’s *Match
Point*), who puts an entirely new spin on Henry VIII. And could there be a more
perfect Cardinal Wolsey than Sam Neill? This is a stellar cast with a superb
storyline. *The Tudors* make the buffoons in the Bush Administration look like,
well, buffoons.
Alas, they are *our* buffoons.
Where is the Tower of London when you need it?
Speaking of buffoons, was there a late night comedy venue that did not show
clips of and poke fun at the embarrassing events at last week’s annual
Radio/Television Correspondents' Association Dinner in Washington?
The “hit” of the evening, of course, was “MC Rove”–Karl Rove rappin’ about his
bad self.
*Omigod.* Do these guys have no shame? As Jimmy Kimmel–the original schoolyard
bully–noted: “Did these guys forget there’s a war on?”
First, Rove introduced himself as Patrick Fitzgerald. (You know, the U.S.
Attorney who nearly indicted him and who had been shortlisted to be fired for
allegedly not doing his job–or doing it too well--in the recent U.S. Attorneys
scandal.)
Rove was introduced and then asked what he did when he wasn’t working, to which
The Architect said, “I like to go home, get a drink–non-alcoholic, because I
don’t drink–and tear the tops of small animals. Rip the heads off of small
animals.” (We’re not kidding. Check out YouTube if you want to see the entire
exchange.)
Then he was asked if he had any other hobbies, since that was decreed “sort of
*Silence of the Lambs.*”
Rove asserted, “I readily admit I am a practicing philatilist.” Pause.
“Stamp-collector.”
To which the announcer said, “God, I hope it’s stamps, because the first thing
that popped into my head was not stamps.” Loud laughter.
Then we go to the rappin’ Rove, which begins with, “Listen don’t get the
jitters, but Rove likes to tear the heads off of critters.”
Yes, this is our government at play. Tearing the heads off small animals. Let’s
imagine the Mahmoud Ahmandinejad version, now, shall we?
Speaking of Mr. Windbreaker, is there a reason why Tony Blair is getting into a
pissing match with this guy? Ahmadinejad is the only “elected” leader on the
planet with a lower approval rating than Bush and Blair. Has it not occurred to
the Poodle Apparent that perhaps the better part of valour (he might try going
to see *The Queen* or watch *The Tudors*) would be to just say, “Oops, we
accidentally crossed into your waters” *even if it’s not true* and “We’d like
our people back, please.”
Can anyone say “Bay of Pigs?” Remember the concept of *negotiation*? Or are
truncheon politics the wave of the present (because there will be no future
without diplomacy)?
And frankly, we’re tired of everyone thumbing their noses at the Geneva
Conventions as if they weren’t supposed to save us from perdition and
lawlessness, not to mention soullessness. Forcing captured sailors to read false
confessions is just so not cool.
Speaking of not cool, we did so love seeing Nancy Pelosi on every network
telling Bush to “calm down” as if he were a child throwing a tantrum.
*As if.*
If you are, like us, looking for an antidote to the Bush antics, watch *Planet
Earth* on the Discovery Channel. The series is extraordinarily beautiful, if a
bit disturbing in a *March of the Penguins* kind of way. The opening bits with
the polar bears is an emotional roller coaster, as are the snow leopards, but
since these creatures may be completely wiped off the face of the earth within
the next 20 to 30 years, we should see what we can of them. The American version
of the BBC series is narrated by Sigourney Weaver (sorry, but she’s no David
Attenborough; still, it’s a competent narration) and is in hi-def, which makes
for absolutely breath-taking viewing. Well worth watching. Plus, it’s chock full
of information about the planet. (Warning–not for the faint of heart, nor for
small children who will be upset by animals killing each other.)
Otherwise, the mid-season shows are utterly unremarkable. *Raines* has not
gotten better over time, although we have really enjoyed seeing the strange Jeff
Goldblum on every talk show doing his perverse shtick. And the new ABC sit-com
*Notes from the Underbelly,* about pregnancy and parenthood? ABC has already
moved it so it won’t conflict with *American Idol,* and that’s before it even
debuted. If you think peeing on a stick is amusing, you’ll love this one.
There’s no one funny line in the show. Not one.
But then no one can sing on *American Idol* this season and outside of the
professionals, no one can dance on *Dancing with the Stars.* (Admit it--we are
all watching simply to see Heather Mills’ leg come off.) So why the ratings
worries?
Meanwhile, in a story ripped from the headlines, former senator Fred Thompson,
who plays the conservative DA Arthur Branch on *Law& Order,* is considering a
run for the Republican ticket in 2008. The most recent Gallup polls last week
put Thompson third among Republican voters behind Rudy Giuliani and John McCain.
But Thompson’s candidacy got tossed a wrench tossed on March 30th when Focus on
the Family’s Rev. James Dobson said Thompson was “not a Christian.”
Dobson’s people asserted that the evangelical pastor known for his virulent
attacks on queers didn’t mean that Thompson was, say, Muslim, which he has
intimated about Barack Obama, but just that Thompson didn’t discuss matters of
faith in the evangelical way. And beat people up accordingly.
Dobson currently supports Newt Gingrich for the 2008 spot.
Dobson’s support of Bush in 2000 and 2004 was pivotal in garnering the
evangelical vote for Bush. Evangelicals represent one in four Christians in
America. The evangelical movement has already voiced its displeasure over
Giuliani’s multiple marriages and his announcement to Barbara Walters in the
March 30th *20/20* that he would have his wife sit in on cabinet meetings.
(Giuliani has since back-tracked from that statement.)
With this column we want to introduce the Rant of the Week–a bit we saw on the
tube that just was too good not to share. This supplants the quote of the week
in that it might be longer and might not be overtly funny; it could be just an
*omigod* moment.
Thus, there might be a rant of the week from someone in the Bush Administration.
Tony Blair was almost our ranter of the week when he took on Mr. “Who says a
windbreaker isn’t chic?” Ahmadinejad. (Blair’s just as much of an ass as Bush,
he just sounds so much smarter and of course understands the concept of
grammar.) Ditto Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), when he suggested on a host of TV talk
shows that impeachment had to be considered as an option if Bush continues to
ignore Congress. And then there was the refreshingly open declaration by the
Edwards’ about Elizabeth Edwards cancer.
All worthy candidates for the Rant of the Week.
But–then we caught this wonderful closing at the end of *Real Time* with Bill
Maher and, well, you’ll see why we just *had* to share it. Maher’s homily was
made all the more powerful, we might add, because he is *not* a liberal. He’s a
self-proclaimed conservative-leaning libertarian who did not recognize the
dangers Bush presented back in 2000, when he continually insisted that Bush and
Gore were interchangeable.
However, like so many others, Maher changed his tune moments after 9/11 when he
saw just how dangerous Bush really is.
Here’s what Maher had to say about one of the latest scandals of the Bush
Administration, Plamegate. And of course, due to Maher’s language, this rant
could not be aired on network or in prime time. So, transcribed for you with
loving care, Bill Maher:
“Not to generalize, but the 29 percent of people who still support President
Bush are the ones who love to pronounce themselves more patriotic than the rest
of us. But just saying you are patriotic is like saying you have a big cock: if
you have to say it, chances are it’s not true.
“And indeed the party that flatters itself that they protect America better, is
the party that has exhausted the military, left the ports wide open, and
purposefully outed a CIA agent, Valerie Plame. That’s not treason anymore,
outing a spy? Did I mention it was one of our spies?
“How despicable that Bush’s lackeys attempted to diminish this crime by
belittling her service, like she was just some chick who hung around the CIA, an
intern really, groupie if you want to be mean about it.
“No. *Big lie.* Valerie Plame was the CIA’s operational officer in charge of
counter proliferation. Which means she tracked loose nukes.
“So when Bush said that his absolute number one priority was preventing
terrorists from getting loose nukes, that’s what *she* worked on. That’s what
she devoted her life to, staying under cover for 20 years. Maintaining two
identities *every goddamned day.* That’s extraordinary service to your country.
“Valerie Plame was the kind of real- life secret agent George Bush dreams of
being when he’s not too busy pretending to be a cowboy or a fighter pilot. CIA
agents *are* troops. This was a military assassination, of one of our own, done
through the press, ordered by Karl Rove. He said of Valerie Plame, “She’s fair
game” and then Cheney shot her.
“George Bush likes to claim that he doesn’t question his critics patriotism,
just their judgment. Well, let me be the first of *your* critics, Mr. President,
to question your judgment and your patriotism. Let’s not forget why they did it
to her. Because Valerie Plame was married to Joe Wilson, who the Bush people
hated because he busted them on one of their bullshit reasons for invading
Iraq....Valerie Plame’s husband told the truth about *their* lie, so they were
willing to jeopardize a whole network of spies to ruin her life.
“*Wow.* Even the mob doesn’t go after your family.
“Mark Twain said, ‘Patriotism is supporting your country all the time and your
government when it deserves it.’ And I say Valerie Plame is a patriot because
she spent her life serving her country.... Valerie Plame kept her secrets. The
Bush Administration leaked like the plumbing at Walter Reed.
“In 2008, I really think Hillary Clinton should run for president on a platform
of restoring honor and integrity to the Oval Office.”
Stay tuned. It can only get more nasty from here.
Send your comments to: NationalView@aol.com or comments@nationalview.org
-Noah Greenberg